Back to the AI Video Blog

AI video model selection

WAN vs Grok vs Seedance vs Veo: AI Video Model Comparison

Compare WAN, Grok, Seedance and Veo for image-to-video, text-to-video, resolution, audio, duration and use cases, with verified sources and examples.

Published July 26, 202614 min readBy FreeWanVideo Editorial Team
Luminous koi swimming through the air above a rain-covered temple courtyard, an original AI video source frame
Original reference image created for this guide and used in the generation tests below.

Key takeaways

  • WAN 2.6 is the clearest current choice on FreeWanVideo when 1080p image-to-video is a core requirement.
  • Grok is useful when you want both image- and text-led workflows plus several clip lengths and aspect ratios.
  • Seedance is the most explicitly multimodal family in this group, with strong emphasis on synchronized audio-video creation.
  • Veo 3.1 is a polished text-led option in the current site interface, but Google's official family supports broader inputs than this integration exposes.

Original generation tests

These are original outputs generated through the same model integrations used by FreeWanVideo. They are examples, not a guarantee that every prompt will produce the same result.

WAN 2.5: rigid-object and atmosphere test

A coastal train clip testing vehicle geometry, forward travel, reflections, cloud movement and ocean spray.

Model and settings
WAN 2.5 Pro · 5 seconds · 720p · audio off
Prompt used
The silver train moves smoothly forward around the coastal curve. Low clouds drift across the green mountains, ocean spray rises below, wet rails shimmer in sunrise light. Slow cinematic tracking shot, stable train geometry, realistic speed and reflections.

WAN 2.6: body motion and depth test

A layered forest shot testing a walking subject, water contact, particles, fog and camera retreat.

Model and settings
WAN 2.6 Flash · 5 seconds · 720p · audio off
Prompt used
The astronaut walks slowly toward the camera through the shallow stream. Ferns sway in a gentle wind, luminous spores float through layered fog, water ripples naturally around each boot. Subtle dolly backward, stable suit details, cinematic blue and amber lighting.

Grok Imagine Video: wind consistency test

A wind-led scene testing whether the kite, ribbons, scarf and grass respond as one coherent environment.

Model and settings
Grok Imagine Video · 6 seconds · 480p · normal mode
Prompt used
The red kite climbs and dips in a strong breeze while its ribbons flutter. Long grass rolls in waves and the person's scarf moves naturally. Slow handheld push forward, realistic wind physics, preserve the person's identity and landscape.

Seedance 2.0 Mini: fantasy motion test

A magical-realism scene testing several koi, falling leaves, mist, wet reflections and stable architecture.

Model and settings
Seedance 2.0 Mini workflow · 5 seconds · 480p · audio off
Prompt used
The airborne koi swim slowly from left to right with natural fin motion. Red maple leaves spiral through drifting mist, rainwater ripples across the courtyard, lantern reflections shimmer. Gentle cinematic dolly in, preserve temple architecture and fish anatomy.

Fast model selector

Current FreeWanVideo workflow comparison

WorkflowInput exposed hereResolution exposed hereDuration exposed hereAudio controlGood starting use
WAN 2.5 ProImage720p5 or 10 secondsOptionalShort product or lifestyle animation
WAN 2.6 FlashImage720p or 1080pModel-specific choicesOptionalHigh-definition image animation
Grok VideoImage or text480p or 720p6, 10 or 15 secondsNot presented as the core controlFlexible social and concept shots
Seedance 2.0 MiniImage; optional last frame480p or 720p4, 5 or 7 secondsOptionalFast multimodal iteration
Seedance 1.5 ProImage480pWorkflow-specificOptionalShort scenes designed around sound
Veo 3.1Text720p8 secondsModel supports audio; site workflow is fixedCinematic text-led landscape shots

This table describes the site interface checked on July 26, 2026. It is not a claim that the official model families are limited to these controls. Providers and integrations can change, so verify the generator before committing a production schedule.

WAN: practical resolution choices and image anchoring

WAN is the natural starting family for this site because the product is built around WAN workflows. The current WAN 2.5 vs WAN 2.6 comparison covers the details: WAN 2.5 offers a simpler 720p path, while WAN 2.6 adds the current 1080p option and the newer official family's audio and multi-shot capabilities.

Choose WAN when the starting image already carries the desired identity and composition, and your prompt can concentrate on motion. It is especially sensible for product scenes, landscapes, vehicles and cinematic reference frames where geometry must remain anchored.

Grok: flexible input and duration choices

xAI documents Grok Imagine Video across text-, image- and video-led workflows. FreeWanVideo currently exposes image-to-video and text-to-video, with 6-, 10- and 15-second choices at 480p or 720p. That makes Grok useful when clip length and aspect-ratio exploration matter more than the highest resolution available on the site.

The kite example above tests coherent wind across several objects. It should not be read as proof that Grok is always better for environmental motion; it shows how to design a prompt around one physical cause so multiple visible elements move consistently.

Seedance: multimodal and sound-led creation

ByteDance describes Seedance 2.0 as accepting text, image, audio and video references in a unified generation and editing system. Seedance 1.5 Pro also emphasizes joint audio-video generation. These official capabilities make the family especially relevant to shots where sound, dialogue, ambience or multi-reference control is central.

“Seedance 2.0 Mini” is the name of FreeWanVideo's lighter workflow, not a separate official ByteDance model name. The site currently provides image-led generation, an optional last frame, audio and 480p/720p choices. Stating that distinction prevents the interface label from being mistaken for official product taxonomy.

Veo 3.1: prompt-led cinematic generation

Google documents Veo 3.1 with text-to-video and image-to-video capabilities, 720p and 1080p output and 24 FPS. FreeWanVideo currently exposes a narrower text-to-video entry configured for an 8-second, 720p, 16:9 result. Use the site workflow when you want to create the scene from a written shot description rather than anchor it to an uploaded image.

No Veo clip is included in this article's original test set, so this comparison does not make output-quality claims based on an unseen example. Veo is compared here using Google's documented capability and the controls currently visible on FreeWanVideo.

How to run a fair comparison yourself

  1. Choose one source image that all candidate image-to-video models accept.
  2. Write a neutral prompt with one action, one camera move and one continuity constraint.
  3. Match duration, resolution and audio setting as closely as each interface allows.
  4. Generate at least three outputs per model because a single generation is noisy evidence.
  5. Score identity, geometry, motion, prompt adherence, camera stability, audio and usable-frame percentage separately.
  6. Record the visible settings and model label with every exported file.

Recommendation by use case

Use caseStart withWhy
1080p image animationWAN 2.6Current site workflow exposes 1080p
Short 720p WAN clipWAN 2.5Simple 5- or 10-second path
Longer social experimentsGrok6-, 10- and 15-second choices
Start/end-frame conceptSeedance 2.0 MiniOptional last-frame control in the current interface
Sound-led short sceneSeedance or WAN audio workflowOfficial families emphasize synchronized audio-video
Text-led cinematic landscapeVeo 3.1Current entry opens directly in text-to-video

Bottom line

Pick the workflow that exposes the input, duration, resolution and audio controls your shot needs. WAN 2.6 is the strongest current site choice for high-definition image animation; Grok is flexible across input and clip length; Seedance is compelling for multimodal and sound-aware work; Veo 3.1 is the direct text-led cinematic option. Then validate with your own frame and prompt—model selection is a starting hypothesis, not the final creative decision.

Frequently asked questions

Which AI video model is best for image-to-video?

There is no universal winner. WAN 2.6 is a strong fit when FreeWanVideo users need 720p or 1080p image animation; Grok offers flexible clip lengths and both image- and text-led workflows; Seedance emphasizes multimodal and audio-video creation. Choose by the shot and required controls, then test.

Which models can generate audio with video?

The official WAN 2.5, WAN 2.6, Seedance 1.5 Pro, Seedance 2.0 and Veo 3.1 families document audio-capable generation. FreeWanVideo exposes audio controls only where its current integration supports them, so check the selected workflow before submission.

Can Veo 3.1 generate video from an image?

Google documents image-to-video support for Veo 3.1. FreeWanVideo's current Veo 3.1 landing page opens a text-to-video workflow configured for an 8-second, 720p, 16:9 result, which is a narrower site implementation.

Are the example videos a controlled benchmark?

No. The examples show real workflow outputs but use different images and prompts, so they demonstrate motion challenges rather than rank model quality. A controlled benchmark would reuse the same source, prompt, duration, resolution and repeated generations.

Official sources checked

Product capabilities change. The factual model claims in this guide were checked against these primary sources on July 26, 2026.

Try the workflow

Turn your own image into a video

Upload a reference image, choose the model that matches your resolution and motion needs, then start with one clear subject action and one camera move.

Open Image to Video